Adaptation (Film Review) [13 of 200]


Adaptation._filmPlot

Tasked with adapting a book about flowers into a film, the writer of Being John Malkovich must venture on a journey of both mind and body to find what makes the flower book so interesting. All this, while dealing with an annoying twin brother who wants to become a screenwriter just like him.

Pros

The thing that makes this movie interesting is Nicolas Cage and the fact that he had great chemistry with himself. Now that makes little sense, but what I mean is that Mr. Cage gave not one, but two believable performance in a film that is often times just him talking to his brother, which was played by him. The movie is pretty quirky, just as quirky as Being John Malkovich, which does the movie well. The supporting cast also does a pretty good job. The story of writing the screenplay was very interesting, though Cage’s performance did carry it past the boring parts.

Cons

The parts on how the story came to be written were a bit more boring than the other parts of the film and they weren’t lucky enough to have power house performances to carry them. While just as quirky as Malkovich, this one still fails to live up to what Jonze created with that film.

0035Fun Fact: Donald Kaufman was credited for co-writing the film and was nominated for an Academy Award, making him the first fictitious character to be nominated for an Academy Award.

 

About these ads

11 thoughts on “Adaptation (Film Review) [13 of 200]

  1. Pingback: Adaptation (2002) | timneath

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s